2nd term: Signed, sealed and delivered to Amaechi

Daily Sun

The authors of this outrageous misquotation , so to speak, should spare us some degree of sanity and intellectualism also. They should admit to themselves, ...



and more »

Box Office Weekend: The Basterds Are Glourious

TIME

Actually, those words aren't Weinstein's; they're from Peter Bradshaw's early review of the movie in The Guardian UK But the appearance of the misquotation ...



and more »

Hopes Fade for ILA Contract Extension

The Journal of Commerce Online

Robb said that was a second, third, fourth, fifth or sixth-hand misquotation of a remark he made in April when he said that any extension would need to be ...

Christians, isn't saying that the Jews are blind about who Jesus was the equivalent of calling God a liar?
Q. You all agree that God gave Jews Holy scripture in the form of His perfect word, and in his perfect word he gave them specific details about what a messiah was, and what THE Messiah was supposed to do. So why is it that when Jews say Jesus didn't fullfill the prophecies God gave to them about THE Messiah, you all say they don't know what they're talking about? Weren't they the ONLY ones who accepted God's Torah? Weren't they the only ones who had to live by it? Aren't they the only ones who wrote anything at all in the Tanakh? Didn't God give it to them, as opposed to the Greeks and Romans that spread Christianity? This link shows what God told Jews about THE Messiah: To deny that these prophecies are the real ones, as opposed… [cont.]
Asked by Heart of Gold (ELTA) - Mon Oct 15 17:28:04 2007 - - 22 Answers - 0 Comments

A. The way this problem is skirted always amazes my. It appears as if God planned on abandoning the Jews from the very start. Why would God clear out the promised land, committing genocide on all the original inhabitants, only to turn his back on the Jews and then transmit their inheritance of paradise over to the Gentiles he despised in the first place? God spent 4,000 years keeping the Jews separate from Gentiles, only to mix them in with Christianity, knowing that Christianity would adopt pagan rituals like Christmas, Easter and Communion which he intently kept the Jews from? Doesn't makes sense at all.
Answered by su s Blessed Cheese Maker - Mon Oct 15 17:37:45 2007

She Did it to "Save her Ass" Is That Unprofessional?
Q. I was treated for an STD that I caught after a sexual assault at Planned Parenthood. I did not feel welcome there. First off the clinician said "Don't worry. You could only get HIV if he had like a ton of C U M on his finger" Shouldn't they not be using that word? Also, after my pelvic exam was done, the clinician said "You better be thankful she did that, you know. She didn't have to do that. She did it to save her a$$. Also, I said " I was sexually assaulted when a man put his finger into my vagina." and they quoted me as saying "fingered me in" And they wrote "Advised HIV test for coitus unprotected". I never said I had unprotected coitus. (Like I said before, it was a digital penetration) Also, they checked off a bunch of things… [cont.]
Asked by Sammie - Tue Aug 19 19:34:22 2008 - - 6 Answers - 0 Comments

to all JW and non-catholics ?
Q. what would do if you trusted you pastors/elders all you life,and you find out that you were lied to, example the watchtower say's that the "so called"church fathers did not teach or believed in the Trinity,in there book "should you believe in the trinity?first if you are a JW and know what I'm talking about ,you will notice that there is no references to go out and Research their writings,like Tertullian,ST Irenaeus,Origen and ST Justin Martyr and others.Again what would you do if you been told that "you are in the truth" but was far off in misquotations of the Church Fathers,would you question the wts and examine the WTS? first,mum tiny,I use to believe what you believe as a non Catholic and did not what to come into this Church,but the… [cont.]
Asked by ROMAN CATHOLIC APOLOGIST - Tue Nov 25 00:12:53 2008 - - 17 Answers - 1 Comments

A. Lets take it from a non-religous standpoint for a second or two. We have a faith that was founded 2000 years ago called Catholic, it may not have been called that at the begining but it was around 100ad as there are documents to prove this. Now as usual there are heresies over the centuries that disapear etc, ok now that all makes sense. There is no bible for the first 400 years or so (new Testement) they only had oral and written ceremonies and tradition that they had been told by paul and peter to hold on to. Now lets go forward 2000 years, we still have that same church and its florishing worldwide despite the gates of hell attacking it in the worst ways possible. But now we have a number of heresies that sprung up a few hundred… [cont.]
Answered by livingthelife - Tue Nov 25 09:24:25 2008